One of the most common methods for taking creatine is using a ‘loading’ and ‘maintenance’ phase, and, I recently wrote an article to advise people on what tends to be the most effective way of using creatine this way.

What Thunderbird displays depends entirely on the feed data available. In some feeds, you have nothing but a title and a link to the website (in this case, Digg); in others, it is possible that you’d see the entire Digg page. (Last I checked, this was the behavioral difference between Digg’s RSS 2.0 feed and its Atom feed.) On the other hand, all feeds that link to, say, Perry Bible Fellowship, the online comic, have ONLY a title and nothing more; this is to drive traffic to the webserver interactively.

That said, at this point, if you need integration with Microsoft products and Exchange servers and so forth, you would do well to consider Evolution . Frankly, I’ve been using 64-bit Linux on my personal machines and 32-bit WinXP Pro at work, so I use GMail and Google Reader to keep track of this sort of thing these days for the sake of cross-platform compatibility.

Also, thank you for your troubleshooting help with the layout–I’m revamping the site to use a Drupal backend instead of this old clunky WordPress interface. I still reply to comments, though, so feel free; and I’m the only person who sees your email address when you enter it, so I’ll of course be glad to correspond with you off-ThinkBlog.

Be well and thanks again.

If I had a digg account — which I don’t and do not want — assuming everything else was set up properly according to your above instructions, would clicking on a message in tbird open the ultimate destination site, or just open the digg page with all the useless comments and advertsing, wherein I would have to then click the link to open the destination URL?

I am just curious, as, if the behavior was the former, that would upgrade my chance of ever making a digg account to “snowball’s chance in hell”, from the current “zero, and I mean ZERO!” (If the behavior was the latter, I think that would somehow actually reduce the probability to below zero!!!)

BTW this text box I am typing in right now has bad behavior under IE6. Keeps expanding beyond the right extent of my screen. (If I open/close the ‘favorites’ pane, it resizes to the proper size when the document pane is redrawn, but as soon as I type a character, it expands again. Also, if u are trying to recreate, I am running 1600×1200 desktop resolution, and I had the favorites pane open when I first came to the site.)

(Yes, I know IE6 is the bastard stepmother of all browsers, but I need a MS browser for work and IE7 sucks 10x worse.)

On the other hand, perhaps all that pang of loss is the result of a misdirected love in the first place, since Christ is to be the Alpha and Omega; but I find myself despairing at this kind of thought (this is a difficult word; who can bear it?).

Thanks for your input! I hope you’ll keep coming back once the site is revamped.

10 CLS: PRINT “FACTORIAL CALCULATOR”: PRINT
20 INPUT “ENTER NUMBER: “; N#
30 U# = 2
40 FOR T# = U# TO N#
50 U# = U# * T#
60 NEXT T#
70 PRINT “THE ANSWER IS: “; U# / 2

When I think of eventually being “like the angels”, loving all the other Divinely-created souls, I feel a pang of loss for this “special” love, this feeling that I am essential to someone else, that that person wants ME, in particular, to love them and be there for them.

Clearly, there is something wrong with my conception, one way or the other. I just feel that there is something valuable in this kind of attachment.

Any thoughts?