ThinkBlog

philosophy :: psychology :: theology :: technology

29 June 2006

Digg v Slashdot

12:00:26 :: [technology &c.] :: 404 words

In the debate between Digg and Slashdot, Digg users are prickly about it … but both have their strengths. Here’s a comment I posted a few days ago in response to another comment.

Slashdot’s maturity and complex threaded/moderation model lends a greater feel of community.

That said, having been a long time (since about ‘99) lurker at Slashdot, I’ve hardly ever posted a comment, because I feel so underqualified. There ARE many more industry players there, and experts in every field. This means that “me too” posts get modded to oblivion, and you REALLY have to say something insightful, informative, funny, or what have you, in order to not be picked apart. And even then, you’ll say something from an expert voice and get +5 Insightful; the guy that comes up after you will counterpoint and make +5 Insightful himself, from an opposite point of view. The dregs, you don’t even see if you put your view level at +1 or +2.

That makes it more intimidating for lesser geeks like myself to post comments there–but it’s also wonderful, because the comments are so good that you come away from Slashdot discussion feeling more informed on the issue.

At Digg, it’s a little different. I feel qualified to post here. My experiences in comp sci, programming, psychology, and philosophy all combine to make me feel qualified to whatever extent to post on something like, for instance, this. The community itself is younger, more raw, less refined, and that’s a good thing for n00bs and even intermediates who want to climb the ladder of knowledge to expert level.

The difference is like that between a good Scotch on the rocks and a fruity mixed drink. Not everyone has a taste for the Scotch, and why wait? The refinement of Slashdot means déjà vu, having to wait for articles that Digg sometimes picks up, but it also means getting the inside track on expert opinions along with a smattering of inside jokes and community feel. The quick, democratic pace and tone of Digg means that there are duplicate stories, lots of “me too” comments, lots of misinformation, but that’s the cost of having more news, more quickly.

Hence, both Digg and Slashdot feeds remain in my RSS aggregator!

Leave a Reply

Digg v Slashdot

12:00:26 :: [technology &c.] :: 404 words

In the debate between Digg and Slashdot, Digg users are prickly about it … but both have their strengths. Here’s a comment I posted a few days ago in response to another comment.

Slashdot’s maturity and complex threaded/moderation model lends a greater feel of community.

That said, having been a long time (since about ‘99) lurker at Slashdot, I’ve hardly ever posted a comment, because I feel so underqualified. There ARE many more industry players there, and experts in every field. This means that “me too” posts get modded to oblivion, and you REALLY have to say something insightful, informative, funny, or what have you, in order to not be picked apart. And even then, you’ll say something from an expert voice and get +5 Insightful; the guy that comes up after you will counterpoint and make +5 Insightful himself, from an opposite point of view. The dregs, you don’t even see if you put your view level at +1 or +2.

That makes it more intimidating for lesser geeks like myself to post comments there–but it’s also wonderful, because the comments are so good that you come away from Slashdot discussion feeling more informed on the issue.

At Digg, it’s a little different. I feel qualified to post here. My experiences in comp sci, programming, psychology, and philosophy all combine to make me feel qualified to whatever extent to post on something like, for instance, this. The community itself is younger, more raw, less refined, and that’s a good thing for n00bs and even intermediates who want to climb the ladder of knowledge to expert level.

The difference is like that between a good Scotch on the rocks and a fruity mixed drink. Not everyone has a taste for the Scotch, and why wait? The refinement of Slashdot means déjà vu, having to wait for articles that Digg sometimes picks up, but it also means getting the inside track on expert opinions along with a smattering of inside jokes and community feel. The quick, democratic pace and tone of Digg means that there are duplicate stories, lots of “me too” comments, lots of misinformation, but that’s the cost of having more news, more quickly.

Hence, both Digg and Slashdot feeds remain in my RSS aggregator!

Leave a Reply


[powered by WordPress.]

For the discussion of current and historical trends in the liberal arts, information technology, and religious thought. "Of all human pursuits, the pursuit of wisdom is the more perfect, the more sublime, the more useful, and the more agreeable."

Think.

navigation

categories

search

archives

June 2006
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

meta

ThinkBlog.org has been on the web since August 2003, with 292,449 words in 846 posts.

It is presently 10:29:37 on 18 May 2008, server side. All content except where otherwise noted Copyright © 2000-2006 Michael Phillips.

detail of Plato and Aristotle from 'The School at Athens' by Raphael

affiliations

Get Firefox! News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.



Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Listed on Blogwise Listed on BlogShares

Blog Home

Login

33 queries. 0.984 seconds